Join As a Members
Review Process /Policy
International Journal of Contemporary Research in Computer Science and Technology (IJCRCST) will not accept papers in its journal without prior peer review. There shall be a review process of manuscripts by three independent reviewers (One Indian Reviewer, one Foreign Reviewer and one Guest Reviewer) who are familiar in the relevant subject area. Reviews before publication should not release the confidential information of the contents of papers to others which are under reviewed.
Authors must try for maximum clarity of terms, bearing in mind that the purpose of publication is the disclosure of technical information and that an extremely complex or poorly written presentation can only doubtful the significance of the work presented. Material which is not essential to the continuity of the text (e.g., proofs, derivations, or calculations) be placed in Appendices.
Paper which has been previously copyrighted, published, or accepted for publication will not be considered for publication in the journals.
The review process shall ensure that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers. Acceptance and scheduling of publication of papers in these periodicals shall not be impeded by added criteria and procedures beyond those contained in the review process.
All manuscripts are subject to critical, anonymous peer review. It is to be understood that the final decision regarding manuscript publication rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief. We aim to reach a final decision on all manuscripts within 10 days of submission. Each paper will undergo for peer review within 1-3 working days after submission. Reviewers will return their review comments within 5 days after receiving the paper. If the manuscript is accepted with changes then author(s) will requested to respond with changes suggested by the reviewers. If the paper is selected by IJCRCST Reviewers and the author(s) are need to submit the camera ready paper within a week.
The editorial board is highly committed to the quick review process of the paper, but not with the sacrifice of the right judgment of a paper. The editor evaluates the paper and recommend following results, accept with no revision, accept with minor revision, accept with major revision, reject but encourage revision and invite resubmission, reject.
The explanations of the will be forwarded to the authors, and revisions must be completed and submitted within two weeks after the authors received the reviewers' comments. Late manuscripts may be rejected.
The review process shall ensure that all authors have equal opportunity for publication of their papers. Acceptance and scheduling of publication of papers in these periodicals shall not be delay by added criteria and procedures beyond those contained in the review process.